Well, from New York, actually, but I am seething. I have
just read an item in The Guardian of
May 13 2016 by Simon Jenkins headed: “Books are back. Only the technodazzled
thought they would go away.”
In it, Jenkins argues that sales of e-books are in decline
and that sales of e-readers are in freefall. “Shrewd observers,” he says, “noted the early signs. Kindle sales
initially outstripped hardbacks but have slid fast since 2011. Sony killed off
its e-readers. Waterstones last year stopped selling Kindles and e-books
outside the UK, switched shelf space to books and saw a 5% rise in sales. ...Amazon
has opened its first bookshop.” As for the books themselves, he goes on, “Now
the official Publishers’ Association confirms the trend. Last year digital
content sales fell last year from £563m to £554m. After years on a plateau,
physical book sales turned up, from £2.74bn to £2.76bn.”
The physical book: Not dead yet |
There are two fundamental misunderstandings behind this
article. First, sales of Kindles may have fallen, but that is because fewer
people now read e-books on a dedicated e-reader; they read them on devices they
have for multiple purposes, such as tablets and phones. In fact it's amazing
how many people I see on the New York subway reading on a phone from which they
are also streaming music and reading emails. I do have an e-reader, but when it
gives out, I shan't replace it; I shall use my tablet, or buy a cellphone with
a bigger screen. I already use my tablet instead of my Kindle when reading at
home, as I can stream music to my stereo from it, use social media and see
messages as well as reading. So the fact that e-reader sales are declining is
meaningless. Had Jenkins wanted to know what was really going on, he would have
asked how many e-reader apps were being downloaded to mobile devices.
Second, the Publishers' Association release should be taken
with a large pinch of salt. In fact, an entire salt mine.
I assume they're referring to e-books sold by their members,
which are likely a small minority of those sold, because mainstream publishers'
e-books are so stupidly overpriced. If a publisher has the nerve to charge
$11-$15 for an e-book that I can buy in paperback for $18, or secondhand off Amazon
for $1.25 plus $3.99 postage, why on earth would I bother with the e-book? I
buy more e-books than physical books, but none of them are from members of the
Publishers' Association. They're from independent authors and small presses,
who typically charge $0.99-$3.99. And younger readers are often using platforms
like Wattpad, or consuming flash fiction off the internet. So the figures Simon
Jenkins quotes are, again, meaningless.
I actually do not want
physical books to go away; I buy them often (though mainly secondhand) and so
far have made all my own books available as paperbacks. I also love the way
physical books can be passed from one reader to another. I am delighted by the
informal book exchanges that are appearing. I loved one I saw in Flatbush last
year; basically, a glass case on a pole sticking above someone’s garden wall,
with a note saying “Leave One, Take One.” You can’t do that with eBooks, unless
you have the MOBI or EPUB file (although you can then; perhaps that is the
future). Neither does an eBook provide decoration for your living room, or
delight you with the elegance of its fonts or design.
But the coming of the e-book has made far more available at
a far lower price, and opened up the book market to a dazzling array of
original work that would hitherto never have seen the light of day. I am not
referring to 50 Shades of Gray
(though I must say, I don’t begrudge E.L. James her success). I am thinking of
subversive, unexpected works that no conventional publisher would ever have
touched – many of which I’ve reviewed in these blog pages over the last three
years.
The eBook has disrupted an entire industry, but that
industry is digging its head in the sand and pretending it is a passing phenomenon.
What the Publishers' Association (est. 1896) is afraid of is a changing
landscape in which they are losing control of the market. Hence these rather
desperate efforts to pretend that all is well and we'll soon be back in the
1970s, with publishing controlled by genteel Oxbridge graduates who push out
boring novels about adultery in good taste amongst tweedy people like
themselves. If they want to stay in business they should think about publishing
a much larger number of electronic titles at much lower prices, and using
print-on-demand for physical books so they don't run the risk of unsold lith
runs. And they should stop wasting our time, and theirs, trying to persuade us
that nothing has changed.
You can read Simon Jenkins’s
article here
Mike Robbins's novella Dog! is available as an ebook for just 99c (US) or 99p (UK), or as a paperback, from Amazon (US, UK, and all other country sites), Barnes & Noble, Kobo, Indigo, iTunes and more. Find all his books on Amazon here.
Follow Mike Robbins on Twitter (mikerobbins19), on Facebook or on Goodreads
I will borrow Simon's book out of the library.
ReplyDeleteHa! And if you read it on a Kindle he'd be getting a royalty, though hardly a king's ransom, one suspects.
ReplyDeleteHe could have been a little more skeptical about these figures and what they actually meant. But my beef isn't with him; it's with the old-established publishing industry, which refuses to admit that the world has changed and that they now have to. The worst are the academic publishers, but general publishing also needs to think how it is going to adapt and survive - I think it can actually, but not by sticking its head in the sand and pretending that e-books and independent publishing do not exist.
And here, by contrast, is Jenkins saying something sensible and saying it very well. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/12/crony-capitalist-corruption-david-cameron-british-tax-havens-avoidance
ReplyDelete