Stewart
quickly realises that as a backbench MP he has no agency. But for a long time
he isn’t offered a ministerial post, even a PPS, because Cameron does not like
him. After the 2015 election, however, Cameron does give him a junior
ministerial position at the Department of the Environment, working under Liz
Truss. It is a frustrating experience. He finds it hard to get anything done.
He also finds Truss asking him for a 25-year plan for the environment, insisting
it be ready in a few days. He then finds she has quietly given the task to
several other people as well. So they combine their drafts –which doesn’t please
her. He finds Truss is interested in no-one’s view but her own, and has a brain
that transmits, albeit erratically, but does not receive. Reading this, one is
appalled that she ever held ministerial office at all, let alone the
Premiership.
Later,
under Theresa May, Stewart becomes the Minister of State at the Department for
International Development (DfID) – eventually rising to Secretary of State for
International Development and a Cabinet seat. This is appropriate, as unlike
other MPs he has hands-on experience in development, in Afghanistan; but he
finds the job frustrating and the civil servants obstructive. In between these
two development posts he serves as Prisons Minister. Here he begins
improvements to security and discipline and also renationalises the Probation
Service, the privatisation of which was clearly a blunder. These steps are
taken with support from his boss, Justice Minister and Lord Chancellor David
Gauke. Stewart has praise for very few senior politicians but he does for Gauke
(and for May herself, who he served loyally to the end). Still, Stewart finds
ministerial office frustrating, and thinks the way ministers are moved around
is arbitrary, frequent and not conducive to good government. I’m sure he’s
right.
Posh boy
makes good?
But there were
moments in this book when Stewart did piss me off. Early on he goes to see
Cameron and notes that the Tory leader is surrounded by floppy-haired old
Etonians – but what the hell does he think he is? I can’t condemn
Stewart for being born posh (besides, I went to the same school as him till age
13). But he can lack self-awareness. I also questioned his judgments about
international development. This was my own field for many years. He has genuine
experience of it from Afghanistan, but it is deep rather than broad and while I
agree with some of his views, others seem sweeping. If, as he says, he had
problems with his civil servants at DFiD, this may be why. (He also recently angered
me with a slighting reference on his podcast to VSO, the British equivalent of
the Peace Corps; I was a volunteer for five years.)
Moreover there
is austerity – which Stewart, as a Tory MP, supported. I was struck by a
recent New Yorker piece by Sam Knight (What Have Fourteen Years of
Conservative Rule Done to Britain?, March 25 2024). “Between 2010 and 2018,
funding for police forces in England fell by up to a quarter,” he says, “Officers
stopped investigating burglaries. …Last fall, hundreds of school buildings had
to be closed for emergency repairs, because the country’s school-construction
budget had been cut by 46% between 2009 and 2022.” There is much more of this
in the piece. No doubt Stewart, and other Tories from the time, would argue
that the huge debts incurred in the 2008 bailout had given them little option.
But this is also about who was made to pay the price. “Poorer
communities [that vote Labour] …suffered disproportionately,” says Knight. “In
Liverpool …spending, per head, fell more than in any other city in the country.
Public-health spending in Blackpool, one of the poorest local authorities in
England, was cut almost five times more, per person, than in the affluent
county of Surrey, just south of London, whose eleven M.P.s are all Tories.” In short, the rich brought down the system and
the poor then picked up the bill. Stewart, and every other Tory MP of the time, was complicit
in this.
In fact it would be easy to dismiss Politics on the Edge as a
self-justificatory memoir by yet another posh boy who somehow thinks he has
succeeded on merit. (Russell
Barnes in Civil Service World described it as “400-odd pages of how
right Rory Stewart was at the time, and how history will prove him to be a
visionary.”)
But that would be a pity, because this memoir really does
lift the lid on Parliament and government. Other books have done this before
(Caroline Lucas’s Honourable Friends; Roy Hattersley’s witty Who Goes
Home; Martin Bell’s An Accidental MP; and many more). But for a
vision of sheer dysfunction, few accounts beat this one. No-one can read this
book and continue to believe that Britain is a fully functional democracy.
Moreover Stewart has earned a
hearing. Unlike other posh boys (like Cameron), he didn’t swan out of Oxford
into a job as a research assistant then progress smoothly into Parliament, rising
without trace. He did a lot with his life before politics. His army service was
brief, but he then spent some years as a diplomat, serving in Indonesia and
later as British Representative in Montenegro. He also founded, and for three years ran, an
NGO in Afghanistan, where he met his American wife, Shoshana. He has written a
number of books, including The Prince of the Marshes (now relaunched as Occupational
Hazards), in which he describes his stretch as deputy governor of an Iraqi
province in the wake of the 2003 invasion. In 2000 he took leave from
the Foreign Office to make an epic 18-month walk across Asia; The Places In
Between (which is excellent) describes the Afghan section, but he has
written little of the journey otherwise, and is sometimes said to have been a
spy. This is a bit idle; of course he will have passed any useful information
to the intelligence services – he was a serving diplomat. But it’s true he may
have had much closer links with them; after all, his father Brian Stewart was a
very senior spook. And in general, he’s less David Cameron, more Fitzroy
Maclean – a man whose life and background were very like his own.
 |
Stewart as a Foreign Office minister, at a conference on endangered species in 2018 (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) |
Beware
the slithy Gove, my son
It’s also
clear that Stewart cared about his ministerial briefs. But the Brexit-related
chaos in 2016-2019 meant Ministers were shuffled around even more often than
usual. Stewart held his junior ministerial posts for little more than a year at
most, and his Cabinet post for less than three months. For some Ministers, every
reshuffle will have been a career opportunity. But Stewart feels, rightly, that
this was no way to run a country. You also sense his disgust at the tawdriness
of some of his ‘colleagues’ (I wish Tories would not use that word). In
particular, the duplicity of Michael Gove was breathtaking.
In the end,
however, it’s Boris Johnson who emerges as the villain of this book. And
Stewart confronts him. First he stands against him in the 2019 leadership
contest; he was the only One Nation Tory to dare do so – and only because none
of the others would, by his account. He doesn’t win, although he is probably
the candidate best liked by voters as a whole. Then in September he is one of
21 Tory MPs, many of them former Cabinet ministers, who have the whip removed
for voting against Johnson’s government on a Brexit-related motion. Some of the
MPs later had the whip restored, but Stewart decides to resign from the
Conservative Party altogether. He could contest his seat as an independent in
the December election, but doesn’t; he may have felt he would not win, but in Politics
on the Edge he says he didn’t want to campaign against people who once
campaigned for him. If that was his reason, it was a decent one. Politics on
the Edge ends there.
It has sold
very well and must have earned Stewart a pretty penny. I can’t begrudge
him that. Other senior Tories rolled over and played along with Boris Johnson
although they knew perfectly well what sort of man he was. Stewart, at some
personal cost, did not. Moreover he is an interesting man who has packed a lot
into his 51 years. And Politics on the Edge is a good book –
well-written, forthright, revealing and important.
But there is something
missing from the book: analysis. Stewart is
an old-style conservative with a love of tradition and an innate distrust of
too much change. This traditional style of British conservatism has deep roots, going right back to the French Revolution and the events that followed. It is not unreasonable. After all, since then radical utopians
have likely killed at least as many people as conservatives. Yet change is needed. Britain’s
government and parliament, as seen in Politics on the Edge, are sclerotic
and in a way corrupt. And we’ve just had an election in which a party
won one of the largest majorities in history with just 33.7% of the vote share –
and that’s only of the votes cast; 40% of voters didn’t bother voting at all. This
has been followed by serious civil disorder. If this had happened in some hapless African republic the Foreign Secretary would be wagging their finger at them and muttering about suspension from the Commonwealth. But we cannot see what is happening to us.
Britain’s system is rotten and has
run its course, at least in its present form. That is clear from the book; but at no point does
Stewart really confront the implications or say how we should address
it. I think he
should have done. Politics on the Edge is one of the best political
memoirs I have read and I strongly recommend it. But in that sense, at least,
there is a void at its heart.
If you liked this, you might like…
There’s Green. And There’s Green
Two books by prominent green campaigners show us different ways to be green. The utopian – and the pragmatic
Attlee, Bevin and the New Jerusalem
Clement Attlee’s government transformed Britain at home. Abroad, his Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin did much to shape the postwar world and its alliances. What brought these two very different men together? And who were they really?
The Red Wall – How Labour Lost its Safest Seats
In 2019 Britain’s Labour Party saw its northern strongholds collapse. Why? It is still important to know
If Not Us, Who? If Not Now, When?
A story of courage and resistance from inside Nazi Germany
Love in the Time of Brexit
The 2016 Brexit referendum divided Britain along class lines. Why? Two shrewd, gripping novels on Brexit, class and the dynamics of division
The Polish Anne Frank
The haunting diary of Renia Spiegel
The First Book on the Pandemic…
…appeared in April 202. Slavoj Žižek on COVID, lockdown – and the migrant crisis
Two Fine Novels Inspired by Climate Change
A look at two novels, from American writer Kevin Brennan and the UK’s Alison Layland. They’re very different books, but both show an acute understanding of climate change and the way it shapes the zeitgeist
Doctor in Jail
What are our prisons really like? Two very vivid books by prison doctors – one British, the other American; they pull few punches
The Endgame in the Age of Stupid
Could our society collapse? Yes, and it might be happening right now. Not that I want to alarm you, of course
Why Nations Fail
Daron Acemoglu and James A Robinson shared the 2024 Nobel Prize for Economics. Why? And did they know what they were talking about? A look at their landmark book, Why Nations Fail
Why Europe? Peace, That’s Why
The European Union was never wholly, or even mainly, about economics. It isn’t now
An Anthology of Anger
The Anti-Austerity Anthology is the work of many angry, and sometimes very funny, writers
Tonight in the House: Murder, Booze and More
Jeremy Thorpe, a shocking scandal – and Britain’s House of Commons at its boozy, bonkers best
What is Populism?
Well you might ask. A look at populism, how it’s defined, and how it works
Inequality and Democracy: Can they Coexist?
And if not, what will the endgame be? Revolution? Or gradual decline?
A Higher Loyalty
Who really is James Comey? And what is his beef with Trump? His autobiography, A Higher Loyalty, gave some of the answers – and was better than I expected
Brexit: Reading the Runes
Brexit and British Politics is not the first book about Brexit, but it’s a shrewd and convincing analysis. This referendum wasn’t just about Europe
Being Beastly in Fleet Street
A brilliant, savage new satire on the Street of Shame. But it’s not the first
On Truth and Lies. And How to Show a Troll the Difference
A keyboard warrior’s workshop manual
Don't like anchovies? Don't bother voting, then
There is more than one threat to democracy in Britain, but the worst is an electoral system that seems set up to sabotage it
Post-Factualism
Brexit, the fragmentation of the media, and the rise of post-factual politics
Thinking of Voting Leave? I’d Have Done, Once
From the time of the Brexit referendum
When the Best Lack All Conviction
Two women who didn’t: Rachel Corrie and Heather Campbell
The English Defence League. Served Hot and Cold
Two books looked at the EDL – in very different ways; one was academic, the other more journalistic. Both were good books, and both still have something to tell us about the Right in Britain
Rear-View Mirror
Blood, sweat and tears go into TV programmes and they’re soon forgotten. Or are they? …And do they leave us with shared memories? A very personal look back at some programmes from the 1970s
Cameron’s next five years
In 2015 British Prime Minister David Cameron unexpectedly won re-election with an absolute majority. These were my predictions for his next five years. I got some things rather wrong. But not all of them
So, who were we?
Three Seasons is a book of three novellas, unconnected with each other, but all set in the south of England in the 1980s. These three stories are portraits of a country and its people on the verge of change
Straight from the Sun
Renewable energy will drive a new industrial revolution. That revolution is inevitable, elegant, and already here …Written in 2013
Margaret Thatcher: Unintended Consequences
A piece written on the death of Margaret Thatcher. Did she really transform Britain as she intended? Or did she actually fail to do so, leaving a vacuum where institutions had once been? Some thoughts from 2013
Can the Lentil Save the World?
Well, that might depend on your digestion. A look at the science behind a popular crop. And some rather nice recipes
It’s the Science, Stupid. Or Is It?
Science is under attack. Both Left and Right cherry-pick from its conclusions; they accept or reject climate science or advances in biotechnology according to their prejudices, and examine the evidence on neither. This is dangerous, for all of us
Dimensions of Democracy
What is democracy? Do we oversimplify it?
Mike Robbins’s latest book, On the Rim of the Sea, is now
available as a paperback or ebook. More details here.