James Comey’s A Higher
Loyalty is the book of the year (at least, so far), and some may think they should read it and wonder whether they can be
bothered. Should they?
Sacked FBI Director James Comey’s apologia A
Higher Loyalty has made quite a splash, and seems to have got under the President's skin. It is very much a book of its time and place, and books that
hit the headlines don’t always hang around afterwards. But this one might have
a longer half-life than most. James
Comey isn’t Hemingway and I guess wouldn’t claim to be, but he’s a concise,
engaging writer with a story to tell. There are also some brief but sharp
glimpses of people we think we know –
Rudy Giuliani, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Barack Obama; all of them really
quite vivid. There is also plenty to hold one’s interest before one even gets
to Donald Trump (who appears quite late).
But it’s Trump who is the final target of the book. And good
though it is, I am intrigued as to exactly why Comey wrote it.
A Higher Loyalty
isn’t really an autobiography; rather, it’s a series of morality plays structured
round the events of Comey’s life. So we start by hearing of his struggles at
school in New Jersey, and how he learns one must call out bullies. He talks
about working in a supermarket as a teenager, and the lesson here is what he
learned about leadership from his boss. He is a young lawyer in the
prosecutor’s office in New York, and this lets him discuss the Mafia dons he
helped put behind bars and their morality and code of conduct. He takes his
first major post in government, as Deputy Attorney-General in the George W.
Bush administration, and we are into the story of illegal surveillance and
torture, and how he must demonstrate its illegality. Then he is FBI Director under Obama, and
gives us a glimpse of the latter and of what Comey considers leadership –
courtesy, patience and empathy. Throughout,
there is a theme of public service, and of this higher loyalty – to truth, to
public service, to the Constitution.
All of this is carefully preparing us for when we get to
meet the Orange One, round about page 200. And every life-lesson we’ve read
about in the book so far comes alive at this point, showing us exactly why
Comey thinks him morally bankrupt, soulless and a danger to democracy.
A Higher Loyalty,
in short, is a very neat hatchet job on Trump. But why write it? After all, if
Comey’s the copper-bottomed public servant he’d have us believe, he’d take his
secrets to the grave. I think there are three possible reasons for doing this.
Two do not reflect that well on Comey. The third, however, does.
First, this book could be a self-justification. Comey’s
conduct regarding the Clinton email affair, the way he presented the FBI’s
conclusions on it in July 2016, and his decision to reopen it that October have
made Comey a serious hate figure in some circles. The emphasis Comey puts on
this episode supports the theory that this book is an apologia, as does his
detailed description of his battles with Dick Cheney and his Chief of Staff,
David Addington, over surveillance and torture. As Laurence Dodds put it in a review
in the Telegraph (April 16 2018), “James
Comey wants you to know that he is a good man. Or at least, that he tries. ...[He]
depicts himself as an honest agent in a den of vipers.”
Not everyone is 100% convinced. Carlos Lozada’s review
of the book in the Washington Post (April 14 2018) cites a passage in which Comey
refers to information that could have compromised the then Attorney-General, Loretta
Lynch; but he does not say what it was. It was almost certainly an email in
which Lynch is said to have made improper promises to the Clinton campaign
about the investigation; in fact, there are doubts about the email’s veracity,
and maybe Comey should not have mentioned it. I also wondered if Comey should
have written about the Clinton emails that his team were not able to see (from early in her time as Secretary of State); in
so doing he cast fresh doubt on the affair while claiming that he considered it
closed. That seems a little disingenuous.
And sometimes Comey is just too sure of his ground. Late in
the book Comey comments that: “Doubt, I’ve learned, is wisdom. . . . Those
leaders who never think they are wrong, ... are a danger to the organizations
and people they lead.” This doesn’t impress Lozada. “Trump,” he says, “is the
most severe example of that tendency in this book. But he is not the only one.”
In short, if this book is about self-exculpation, it’s not a total success.
 |
Happier times: Comey's appointment
is announced (FBI/Wikimedia Commons) |
But there’s a possible second motive for writing this, which
is to set out his stall regarding his next job. Comey is only 57, and wouldn’t
be thinking of retirement. He is currently teaching, but it’s hard to believe
he wouldn’t like to jump back in to the fray. He may see himself as a candidate
for Attorney-General. He may even dream of being Vice-President. Although not
currently registered, he’s historically a Republican. If the Trump presidency
ends very badly, as many Americans seem to expect, any Republican candidate in
2020 will need to distance themselves from the disaster – difficult, as many
swung round behind Trump when he won the nomination. One way might be to have as
their running mate one of Trump’s fiercest critics and worst enemies – and a
man who has stated clearly, in this book, that he believes in the rule of law. Still,
so far Comey has given no sign he wants high office again.
And besides, there is a third
explanation: that he has written this book because he is sincerely worried
about what Trump may do to the country’s institutions, and wishes to warn
people.
In particular, he
believes Trump does not understand, or at least not accept, that certain public
officials are not there to serve not him but the broader polity. This is
dangerous. Comey’s main example is the way Trump tried to get a pledge of
loyalty, as a Mafia boss would; the FBI Director cannot give such a pledge –
his duty is to the law. Comey could also, had he wished, said more about the
pressure Trump has put on his Attorney-General, Jeff Sessions, because the
latter has followed the law now and then instead of the President’s wishes.
This isn’t a perfect book. Comey is likely not a perfect
person. Democrats won’t be convinced by his explanations of 2016. And while
Comey does admit to doubts about his past decisions and conduct (Lozada was too
harsh), it’s true he can seem sanctimonious now and then. Even so, Comey seems sincere. “Politics come
and go,” he writes. “Supreme Court justices come and go. But the core of our
nation is our commitment to a set of shared values ...to restraint and integrity
and balance and truth. If that slides away from us, only a fool would be
consoled by a tax cut or a different immigration policy.”
Exculpation? Extended resume? Maybe, in part; but I’m going
with the third explanation . This book is a hatchet job on Trump, to be sure,
but it’s not simply personal. Comey, a senior public servant, wrote this book
as a statement of values that he holds dear, and a warning that they are under
threat. For many, that will be reason to read it.
was published in December 2016 and is available from Amazon and other online retailers, or through bookshops
(ISBN 978-0-9978815-0-9, ebook; ISBN 978-0-9978815-1-6, paperback)
If you liked this, you might like…
There’s Green. And There’s Green
Two books by prominent green campaigners show us different ways to be green. The utopian – and the pragmatic
Politics on the Edge
A look at Rory Stewart’s landmark political memoir. Should you read it? Yes – but it leaves some things unsaid
Attlee, Bevin and the New Jerusalem
Clement Attlee’s government transformed Britain at home. Abroad, his Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin did much to shape the postwar world and its alliances. What brought these two very different men together? And who were they really?
The Red Wall – How Labour Lost its Safest Seats
In 2019 Britain’s Labour Party saw its northern strongholds collapse. Why? It is still important to know
If Not Us, Who? If Not Now, When?
A story of courage and resistance from inside Nazi Germany
Love in the Time of Brexit
The 2016 Brexit referendum divided Britain along class lines. Why? Two shrewd, gripping novels on Brexit, class and the dynamics of division
The Polish Anne Frank
The haunting diary of Renia Spiegel
The First Book on the Pandemic…
…appeared in April 202. Slavoj Žižek on COVID, lockdown – and the migrant crisis
Two Fine Novels Inspired by Climate Change
A look at two novels, from American writer Kevin Brennan and the UK’s Alison Layland. They’re very different books, but both show an acute understanding of climate change and the way it shapes the zeitgeist
Doctor in Jail
What are our prisons really like? Two very vivid books by prison doctors – one British, the other American; they pull few punches
The Endgame in the Age of Stupid
Could our society collapse? Yes, and it might be happening right now. Not that I want to alarm you, of course
Why Nations Fail
Daron Acemoglu and James A Robinson shared the 2024 Nobel Prize for Economics. Why? And did they know what they were talking about? A look at their landmark book, Why Nations Fail
Why Europe? Peace, That’s Why
The European Union was never wholly, or even mainly, about economics. It isn’t now
An Anthology of Anger
The Anti-Austerity Anthology is the work of many angry, and sometimes very funny, writers
Tonight in the House: Murder, Booze and More
Jeremy Thorpe, a shocking scandal – and Britain’s House of Commons at its boozy, bonkers best
What is Populism?
Well you might ask. A look at populism, how it’s defined, and how it works
Inequality and Democracy: Can they Coexist?
And if not, what will the endgame be? Revolution? Or gradual decline?
A Higher Loyalty
Who really is James Comey? And what is his beef with Trump? His autobiography, A Higher Loyalty, gave some of the answers – and was better than I expected
Brexit: Reading the Runes
Brexit and British Politics is not the first book about Brexit, but it’s a shrewd and convincing analysis. This referendum wasn’t just about Europe
Being Beastly in Fleet Street
A brilliant, savage new satire on the Street of Shame. But it’s not the first
On Truth and Lies. And How to Show a Troll the Difference
A keyboard warrior’s workshop manual
Don't like anchovies? Don't bother voting, then
There is more than one threat to democracy in Britain, but the worst is an electoral system that seems set up to sabotage it
Post-Factualism
Brexit, the fragmentation of the media, and the rise of post-factual politics
Thinking of Voting Leave? I’d Have Done, Once
From the time of the Brexit referendum
When the Best Lack All Conviction
Two women who didn’t: Rachel Corrie and Heather Campbell
The English Defence League. Served Hot and Cold
Two books looked at the EDL – in very different ways; one was academic, the other more journalistic. Both were good books, and both still have something to tell us about the Right in Britain
Rear-View Mirror
Blood, sweat and tears go into TV programmes and they’re soon forgotten. Or are they? …And do they leave us with shared memories? A very personal look back at some programmes from the 1970s
Cameron’s next five years
In 2015 British Prime Minister David Cameron unexpectedly won re-election with an absolute majority. These were my predictions for his next five years. I got some things rather wrong. But not all of them
So, who were we?
Three Seasons is a book of three novellas, unconnected with each other, but all set in the south of England in the 1980s. These three stories are portraits of a country and its people on the verge of change
Straight from the Sun
Renewable energy will drive a new industrial revolution. That revolution is inevitable, elegant, and already here …Written in 2013
Margaret Thatcher: Unintended Consequences
A piece written on the death of Margaret Thatcher. Did she really transform Britain as she intended? Or did she actually fail to do so, leaving a vacuum where institutions had once been? Some thoughts from 2013
Can the Lentil Save the World?
Well, that might depend on your digestion. A look at the science behind a popular crop. And some rather nice recipes
It’s the Science, Stupid. Or Is It?
Science is under attack. Both Left and Right cherry-pick from its conclusions; they accept or reject climate science or advances in biotechnology according to their prejudices, and examine the evidence on neither. This is dangerous, for all of us
Dimensions of Democracy
What is democracy? Do we oversimplify it?
